Advanced RAG
Implement sophisticated Retrieval Augmented Generation architectures for complex knowledge scenarios
While basic Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) is powerful for many use cases, complex knowledge scenarios often require more sophisticated approaches. Advanced RAG architectures address challenges such as multi-step reasoning, diverse information types, and specialized domain knowledge.
Beyond Basic RAG
Standard RAG has limitations in certain scenarios:
Complex Reasoning
Questions requiring multi-step analysis or inference
Large Document Sets
Knowledge bases with millions of documents or fragments
Diverse Information Types
Heterogeneous data including structured and unstructured content
Domain-Specific Nuances
Technical fields with specialized terminology and concepts
Multi-Turn Conversations
Discussions that build on previous interactions
Dynamic Information
Content that changes frequently or requires real-time updates
Advanced RAG architectures address these challenges through specialized retrieval strategies, context processing techniques, and generation approaches.
Advanced RAG Architectures
Prisme.ai supports several advanced RAG architectures that you can implement based on your specific needs:
A sequential approach that refines retrieval results through multiple phases.
How It Works:
- First stage performs efficient but less precise retrieval (e.g., BM25 keyword search)
- Second stage applies more intensive semantic filtering on first-stage results
- Final stage re-ranks candidates using cross-encoders or other precise methods
- Only the highest quality content is passed to the LLM
A sequential approach that refines retrieval results through multiple phases.
How It Works:
- First stage performs efficient but less precise retrieval (e.g., BM25 keyword search)
- Second stage applies more intensive semantic filtering on first-stage results
- Final stage re-ranks candidates using cross-encoders or other precise methods
- Only the highest quality content is passed to the LLM
An iterative approach that breaks down complex queries and retrieves information in stages.
How It Works:
- Complex query is broken down into simpler sub-questions
- Each sub-question is processed through its own retrieval cycle
- Results from sub-questions are collected and synthesized
- Final answer incorporates information from all retrieval paths
An approach that generates ideal “hypothetical” documents before retrieval to improve query understanding.
How It Works:
- LLM expands the user’s query into a hypothetical “ideal document” that would answer it
- This expanded representation is embedded and used for retrieval
- The approach bridges terminology gaps between queries and documents
- Retrieved documents better match the user’s actual intent
Integrates structured knowledge graphs with traditional document retrieval.
How It Works:
- Identifies entities and relationships in the user query
- Navigates a knowledge graph to find relevant entities and connections
- Retrieves both structured data (from the graph) and unstructured content (from documents)
- Provides context that includes both factual relationships and detailed explanations
Incorporates reasoning and self-critique to improve retrieval quality.
How It Works:
- Performs initial retrieval and drafts a response
- Evaluates its own response for gaps, contradictions, or uncertainties
- Identifies additional information needed to address issues
- Conducts focused retrieval to fill those gaps
- Revises the response based on complete information
Advanced Context Processing
Beyond retrieval architectures, sophisticated methods for processing retrieved context can significantly improve response quality:
Context Compression
Context Compression
Techniques to reduce redundancy and focus on essential information.
Key Approaches:
- LLM-Based Summarization: Using a model to create concise summaries of retrieved documents
- Semantic Compression: Removing redundant information while preserving meaning
- Information Distillation: Extracting only the most relevant facts and details
- Token Optimization: Maximizing information density within token constraints
Benefits:
- Makes more efficient use of context window
- Reduces noise and distractions
- Allows inclusion of more diverse sources
- Improves response coherence
Contextual Fusion
Contextual Fusion
Methods for combining information from multiple sources cohesively.
Key Approaches:
- Hierarchical Aggregation: Organizing information at different levels of detail
- Cross-Document Coreference: Identifying when different documents refer to the same entities
- Information Reconciliation: Resolving contradictions between sources
- Narrative Threading: Creating a coherent flow across document fragments
Benefits:
- Creates unified context from fragmented sources
- Reduces contradictions and inconsistencies
- Preserves important relationships between facts
- Presents information in logical progression
Contextual Routing
Contextual Routing
Directing different types of queries to specialized processing pipelines.
Key Approaches:
- Query Classification: Categorizing questions by type and intent
- Domain Detection: Identifying the knowledge domain of the question
- Complexity Assessment: Determining question difficulty and required approach
- Pipeline Selection: Choosing the optimal processing strategy
Benefits:
- Applies specialized approaches for different question types
- Optimizes resource allocation
- Improves handling of diverse queries
- Enables domain-specific customizations
Semantic Enrichment
Semantic Enrichment
Adding contextual metadata to improve understanding and retrieval.
Key Approaches:
- Entity Recognition: Identifying and tagging named entities
- Concept Linking: Connecting text to knowledge base concepts
- Semantic Annotation: Adding metadata about meaning and relationships
- Ontology Mapping: Relating content to domain-specific knowledge structures
Benefits:
- Enhances retrieval precision
- Enables concept-based rather than just keyword-based retrieval
- Supports reasoning about relationships
- Facilitates domain-specific understanding
Multi-Agent RAG Systems
For particularly complex knowledge applications, multiple specialized agents can work together:
Query Analysis
A specialized agent analyzes the user’s question to determine required knowledge and approach.
Functions include:
- Intent identification
- Domain classification
- Complexity assessment
- Subtask identification
Knowledge Retrieval
Multiple specialized retrieval agents gather information from different sources.
Examples include:
- Document specialist for textual knowledge
- Structured data agent for databases and tables
- Knowledge graph navigator for entity relationships
- Media analyzer for images and diagrams
Information Synthesis
An integration agent combines and reconciles information from various sources.
Key responsibilities:
- Resolving contradictions
- Organizing information logically
- Identifying information gaps
- Creating unified context
Response Generation
A specialized generation agent creates the final response based on synthesized information.
Focus areas:
- Appropriate format and style
- Clear explanation logic
- Accurate source attribution
- Addressing all aspects of the query
Self-Reflection
A critic agent reviews the response for quality and improvement opportunities.
Assessment criteria:
- Factual accuracy
- Comprehensiveness
- Clarity and coherence
- Appropriate detail level
Each agent focuses on its specialized task, creating a more robust system than any single agent could provide.
Advanced RAG Implementation with Prisme.ai
Implementing advanced RAG architectures in Prisme.ai follows a structured approach:
Using Prisme.ai’s built-in advanced configuration options.
Available advanced options include:
- Multi-stage retrieval configuration
- Query preprocessing settings
- Context handling parameters
- Response generation strategies
This approach is ideal for implementing moderately advanced RAG architectures without requiring coding expertise.
Using Prisme.ai’s built-in advanced configuration options.
Available advanced options include:
- Multi-stage retrieval configuration
- Query preprocessing settings
- Context handling parameters
- Response generation strategies
This approach is ideal for implementing moderately advanced RAG architectures without requiring coding expertise.
Creating custom RAG workflows using the AI Builder’s product.
AI Builder enables:
- Visual workflow construction
- Custom processing steps
- Integration with other systems
- Complex decision logic
This approach is ideal for implementing sophisticated RAG architectures without extensive coding while maintaining high customization flexibility.
Building highly specialized RAG systems using code and Prisme.ai’s APIs.
Custom development allows:
- Implementing cutting-edge architectures
- Integrating proprietary algorithms
- Creating highly specialized workflows
- Maximum control over the entire process
This approach is ideal for organizations with unique requirements and technical resources to implement highly specialized RAG systems.
Webhook Integration for Advanced RAG
Important: The webhook functionality described below requires AI Builder and subscription to specific events. This represents a more technical implementation approach for advanced users who need complete control over the RAG process.
Prisme.ai allows you to build advanced RAG architectures by integrating external services through webhooks. This powerful feature extends the capabilities of AI Knowledge by allowing you to:
- Implement custom processing logic
- Integrate with specialized AI systems
- Override various stages of the RAG pipeline
- Create sophisticated multi-step workflows
Webhook Subscription Events
You can subscribe to different events in the AI Knowledge lifecycle:
Document Management Events
Document Management Events
Monitor and control document processing in your knowledge base.
Available Events:
documents_created
: Triggered when new documents are addeddocuments_updated
: Triggered when existing documents are modifieddocuments_deleted
: Triggered when documents are removed
Common Uses:
- Custom document processing pipelines
- Content moderation and validation
- Metadata enrichment
- Document transformation
Query Events
Query Events
Intercept and process user questions and the RAG pipeline.
Available Events:
queries
: Triggered when users ask questions
Common Uses:
- Custom context retrieval
- Specialized prompt engineering
- Complete answer generation
- Parameter customization
Test Events
Test Events
Monitor and influence the agent testing process.
Available Events:
tests_results
: Triggered for each test case execution
Common Uses:
- Custom evaluation criteria
- Specialized test analytics
- Integration with quality systems
- Performance benchmarking
Webhook Response Options
Depending on the event type, your webhook can return different responses to influence the RAG process:
Provide custom-retrieved context chunks while letting AI Knowledge handle prompt generation and LLM interaction.
Response Format:
Ideal For:
- Custom retrieval strategies
- External knowledge sources
- Specialized context processing
- Dynamic information integration
Provide custom-retrieved context chunks while letting AI Knowledge handle prompt generation and LLM interaction.
Response Format:
Ideal For:
- Custom retrieval strategies
- External knowledge sources
- Specialized context processing
- Dynamic information integration
Take control of the entire prompt while letting AI Knowledge handle the LLM interaction.
Response Format:
Ideal For:
- Specialized prompt engineering
- Custom context formatting
- Chain-of-thought implementation
- Domain-specific instruction tuning
Bypass the entire RAG and LLM process by providing the final answer directly.
Response Format:
Ideal For:
- Integration with specialized AI systems
- Pre-computed responses
- Multi-agent architectures
- Advanced processing pipelines
Customize AI parameters while letting AI Knowledge handle the rest of the process.
Response Format:
Ideal For:
- Dynamic model selection
- Context-aware parameter tuning
- Adaptive temperature setting
- Query-specific customization
Provide custom evaluation scores for test results.
Response Format:
Ideal For:
- Specialized evaluation criteria
- Domain-specific quality assessment
- Custom benchmarking
- Comparative analysis
Setting Up Webhook Integration
To implement webhook integration for advanced RAG:
Create External Service
Develop your external service with the required logic to handle webhook events.
Requirements:
- HTTPS endpoint
- Ability to process webhook requests
- Business logic implementation
- Response generation
Configure AI Builder
Set up AI Builder to enable webhook functionality.
Key steps:
- Create a new automation in AI Builder
- Configure event subscriptions on AI Knowledge
- Connect to your webhook endpoint
- Set up authentication
Subscribe to Events
Choose which events your webhook should receive.
Options include:
- Document management events
- Query processing events
- Test evaluation events
Test Integration
Verify that your webhook receives events and responds correctly.
Testing steps:
- Monitor webhook requests
- Validate response formats
- Check integration behavior
- Troubleshoot any issues
Use Case Examples
Medical Knowledge Advisor
Challenge: Providing accurate medical information from diverse sources including research papers, clinical guidelines, and drug databases.
Advanced RAG Solution: Multi-stage retrieval with knowledge graph integration
Key Features:
- Entity recognition for medical terms
- Relationship tracking between conditions, treatments, and medications
- Source prioritization based on evidence quality
- Self-reflective validation for factual accuracy
Legal Research Assistant
Challenge: Navigating complex legal documents, precedents, and statutes with precise citation and reasoning.
Advanced RAG Solution: Recursive retrieval with contextual routing
Key Features:
- Hierarchical decomposition of legal questions
- Jurisdiction-aware retrieval pathways
- Citation tracking and verification
- Temporal reasoning about law changes
Technical Support Advisor
Challenge: Troubleshooting complex technical issues spanning multiple products, versions, and systems.
Advanced RAG Solution: Multi-agent RAG with self-reflection
Key Features:
- Problem classification and decomposition
- Product-specific knowledge agents
- Step-by-step solution synthesis
- Verification against known issues database
Financial Analyst
Challenge: Analyzing financial data from reports, market trends, and news to provide investment insights.
Advanced RAG Solution: Hypothetical document embeddings with structured data integration
Key Features:
- Financial query expansion and reformulation
- Integration of numerical data analysis
- Time-sensitive information prioritization
- Data visualization for complex insights
Advanced RAG Best Practices
Architecture Selection
Architecture Selection
- Match architecture complexity to actual needs
- Consider maintenance requirements and technical expertise
- Start with simpler approaches and add complexity as needed
- Validate architecture choices with realistic test scenarios
- Document architecture decisions and rationales
Implementation Strategy
Implementation Strategy
- Use configuration options for moderate customization needs
- Leverage AI Builder for complex but codeless implementations
- Reserve custom development for highly specialized requirements
- Implement iteratively with continuous testing
- Create reusable components for common patterns
Performance Optimization
Performance Optimization
- Monitor and optimize retrieval precision and recall
- Balance response quality with latency requirements
- Consider resource usage for production-scale deployments
- Implement caching strategies where appropriate
- Profile and optimize bottlenecks in the pipeline
Webhook Integration
Webhook Integration
- Ensure webhook endpoints are reliable and performant
- Implement proper error handling and fallback mechanisms
- Use appropriate authentication and security measures
- Monitor webhook performance and reliability
- Document webhook interfaces and expected behaviors