Skip to main content
Prisme.ai provides several ways to create and deploy simple prompting agents:
  • AI Store
  • AI Builder
The AI Store offers a no-code interface for creating simple prompting agents:Key features:
  • Visual editor for system instructions
  • Testing interface for validation
  • One-click deployment to users
  • Usage analytics and feedback collection
Learn more about AI Store →

​
Case Studies: Simple Prompting in Action

Challenge: A financial services company needed to ensure consistent, compliant responses across their customer service team.Solution: They created a simple prompting agent that:
  • Maintained a consistent voice aligned with brand guidelines
  • Incorporated regulatory compliance requirements
  • Structured responses with clear next steps
  • Provided appropriate disclaimers
Results:
  • 42% reduction in response inconsistencies
  • 28% decrease in compliance review flags
  • 18% improvement in customer satisfaction scores
  • 35% faster onboarding for new support staff
Challenge: A technology company wanted to accelerate their sales proposal process while maintaining quality.Solution: They implemented a simple prompting agent that:
  • Generated customized proposal sections
  • Incorporated customer-specific information
  • Applied consistent messaging about value propositions
  • Formatted content according to proposal templates
Results:
  • 65% reduction in proposal creation time
  • 30% increase in proposal volume
  • Consistent quality across the sales team
  • Higher customization for specific client needs
Challenge: A manufacturing company struggled with employee access to internal policies and procedures.Solution: They deployed a simple prompting agent that:
  • Provided consistent explanations of company policies
  • Used a helpful, informative communication style
  • Structured information from general to specific
  • Included relevant cross-references to related policies
Results:
  • 53% reduction in policy-related help desk tickets
  • 47% increase in policy compliance
  • Improved employee satisfaction with information access
  • More consistent application of policies across departments

​
Limitations and Considerations

While simple prompting agents offer significant benefits, it’s important to understand their limitations:

Knowledge Constraints

Limited to information in the model’s training data and system instructionsMitigation:
  • Include essential information in system instructions
  • Consider RAG for knowledge-intensive use cases
  • Ensure regular updates to keep information current

Complexity Boundaries

May struggle with highly complex, multi-step processesMitigation:
  • Break complex tasks into manageable components
  • Use decision trees for intricate workflows
  • Consider tool-using agents for advanced scenarios

Variability in Responses

Some inconsistency may persist despite detailed instructionsMitigation:
  • Use lower temperature settings for consistency
  • Provide explicit examples for critical scenarios
  • Implement structured templates for important responses

Context Window Limitations

Finite space for instructions limits comprehensivenessMitigation:
  • Prioritize most important instructions
  • Focus on principles rather than exhaustive examples
  • Organize instructions efficiently by importance

​
Future-Proofing Your Prompting Strategy

As language models and prompt engineering techniques evolve, consider these approaches to maintain effective agents:
Create modular instruction components that can be updated independently:
# Core Purpose and Identity
You are a Customer Support Specialist for Acme Financial Services...

# Response Structure Guidelines
When answering questions, use this structure...

# Compliance Requirements
Always include these disclaimers when discussing...
This structure allows targeted updates without rewriting all instructions.
Implement regular review processes to assess and improve agent performance:
  • Schedule quarterly prompt reviews
  • Monitor user feedback and satisfaction metrics
  • Track changes in business requirements
  • Assess model performance on key scenarios
  • Document prompt versions and their effectiveness
Systematic evaluation ensures agents remain effective as needs evolve.
Design prompts with a layered approach that can leverage new model capabilities:
# Base Instructions (Core functionality)
Answer questions about our products clearly and accurately...

# Enhanced Instructions (Leverage advanced capabilities)
When appropriate, create comparisons using tables...

# Optional Advanced Features (For newer models)
If you're capable of generating charts, visualize data when it would be helpful...
This approach ensures compatibility across model versions while utilizing new features when available.

​
Implementation in Prisme.ai

Simple prompting agents harness the power of foundation models through carefully crafted instructions, personas, and response formats. While straightforward to implement, these agents can deliver significant value for many business applications when properly designed.

​
What is Simple Prompting?

Simple prompting leverages the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) by providing them with clear instructions, context, and guidance. Unlike more complex agent architectures, simple prompting doesn’t require additional components like knowledge bases or tool integrations.
Simple prompting is sometimes called “prompt engineering” or “instruction tuning” in industry literature.

​
Key Components

System Instructions

Detailed guidance for the model about its role, capabilities, and constraints

Persona Definition

The agent’s identity, voice, tone, and communication style

Response Templates

Structured formats for consistent and predictable outputs

Context Management

Control over how conversation history is maintained and used

​
When to Use Simple Prompting

Simple prompting agents are ideal for:
  • Standardized Interactions: When consistent, predictable responses are required
  • Content Generation: Creating drafts, summaries, or structured text
  • Basic Question Answering: Addressing common inquiries with general knowledge
  • Low-Complexity Tasks: Processes with limited steps and decision points
  • Rapid Deployment: When quick implementation is a priority

​
Benefits of Simple Prompting

Low Technical Barrier

Requires minimal technical expertise to implement

Quick Deployment

Can be created and deployed rapidly

Easy Maintenance

Simple to update and refine over time

Cost Efficiency

Typically requires fewer computational resources

Flexibility

Adaptable to a wide range of use cases

Transparency

Behavior is directly tied to explicit instructions

​
Simple Prompting Architecture

The architecture of a simple prompting agent consists of four primary components:
1

System Instructions

Clear, detailed guidance for the model about its purpose, capabilities, constraints, and behavior.Effective system instructions typically include:
  • The agent’s purpose and role
  • Tone and communication style
  • Domain expertise and knowledge scope
  • Response formats and structures
  • Ethical guidelines and limitations
2

Conversation Management

Strategies for maintaining and utilizing conversation history.Key aspects include:
  • How much conversation history to maintain
  • How to use previous exchanges to inform responses
  • When to reset or maintain context
  • How to handle topic transitions
3

Response Generation

The process of transforming user inputs into appropriate outputs.Important considerations:
  • Response structure and formatting
  • Level of detail and comprehensiveness
  • Handling of uncertainty or incomplete information
  • Balance between conciseness and thoroughness
4

Model Configuration

Technical settings that influence the model’s behavior.Key parameters include:
  • Temperature (creativity vs. determinism)
  • Top-p (diversity of responses)
  • Maximum token length
  • Selected model/version

​
Example Use Cases

  • Customer Support
  • Content Creation
  • Training Assistant
  • Meeting Facilitator
Purpose: Provide consistent responses to common customer inquiriesKey Features:
  • Standardized answers to frequently asked questions
  • Consistent tone aligned with company voice
  • Ability to recognize when to escalate to human support
  • Clear explanation of policies and procedures

​
Implementation Steps

Creating an effective simple prompting agent involves several key steps:
1

Define Purpose and Scope

Clearly articulate what the agent will do, who will use it, and what its boundaries are.Key questions to answer:
  • What specific problems will this agent solve?
  • Who are the primary users?
  • What topics or tasks are in scope vs. out of scope?
  • What level of expertise should the agent demonstrate?
2

Design the Agent Persona

Create a consistent identity, voice, and communication style.Considerations:
  • Tone (formal, conversational, technical, etc.)
  • Communication style (concise, detailed, step-by-step, etc.)
  • Personality traits (helpful, authoritative, friendly, etc.)
  • Domain expertise and perspective
3

Craft System Instructions

Develop clear, comprehensive guidance for the model.Essential elements:
  • Agent purpose and role description
  • Expected behavior and response patterns
  • Constraints and limitations
  • Ethical guidelines and safety guardrails
  • Response formatting requirements
4

Create Response Templates

Design structured formats for consistent outputs.Template types:
  • Information delivery formats
  • Process or procedure explanations
  • Decision-making frameworks
  • Error or uncertainty handling
5

Configure Model Settings

Select the appropriate model and parameters.Key settings:
  • Model selection (balancing capability and cost)
  • Temperature and creativity parameters
  • Context window size
  • Response length limits
6

Test and Refine

Validate performance and iteratively improve.Testing approaches:
  • Expected use cases
  • Edge cases and unusual requests
  • Different user types and interaction styles
  • Potential misuse scenarios

​
Best Practices

The more specific your instructions, the more consistent and accurate your agent’s responses will be. Avoid vague or ambiguous directives.Example:
If the user asks for a process explanation:
  1. Provide a high-level overview in 1-2 sentences
  2. List steps in numerical order
  3. Include relevant cautions or notes after each step
  4. Conclude with common problems and solutions

If the user asks for a product comparison:
  1. Create a table with key features side by side
  2. Highlight main differences in bullet points
  3. Provide a recommendation based on stated needs
  4. Include pricing information if available

If the user asks for a process explanation:
  1. Provide a high-level overview in 1-2 sentences
  2. List steps in numerical order
  3. Include relevant cautions or notes after each step
  4. Conclude with common problems and solutions

If the user asks for a product comparison:
  1. Create a table with key features side by side
  2. Highlight main differences in bullet points
  3. Provide a recommendation based on stated needs
  4. Include pricing information if available
Instead of:
Be helpful and answer customer questions.
Use:
You are a customer support specialist for Acme Corporation's cloud storage service. When answering questions:
1. Focus on clarity and accuracy
2. Include links to relevant documentation when applicable
3. Keep responses under 3 paragraphs
4. If you're uncertain about technical details, acknowledge this and suggest contacting technical support
5. Always maintain a professional, friendly tone
Include examples of ideal responses to guide the model’s output style and format.Example:
When providing product recommendations, follow this format:

RECOMMENDATION:
- Product: [Product Name]
- Key Features: [3-5 bullet points of relevant features]
- Why It Fits: [1-2 sentences explaining why this meets the customer's needs]
- Price Range: [Price category]

Example:
RECOMMENDATION:
- Product: Acme CloudStore Professional
- Key Features:
  * 2TB storage capacity
  * End-to-end encryption
  * Automatic file versioning
  * Cross-platform sync
- Why It Fits: This solution offers the security features you require while providing ample storage for your team of 10-15 people.
- Price Range: Mid-tier ($20-30/user/month)
Provide enough structure for consistency while allowing the model sufficient flexibility to handle diverse user queries.Do:
  • Define clear boundaries and non-negotiable requirements
  • Allow flexibility within those boundaries
  • Provide guidance on handling unexpected inputs
Don’t:
  • Over-constrain with rigid rules for every possible scenario
  • Leave critical behaviors completely unspecified
Order your instructions by priority, with the most important guidance first.Structure Example:
  1. Core purpose and identity
  2. Critical constraints and requirements
  3. Formatting and style guidance
  4. Handling of edge cases and exceptions
Be mindful of the model’s context window size when designing system instructions.Tips:
  • Prioritize essential guidance
  • Be concise but clear
  • Consider what can be embedded in templates vs. what must be in system instructions
  • Use efficient language for common scenarios

​
Common Challenges and Solutions

ChallengeDescriptionSolution
Inconsistent ResponsesAgent provides varying answers to similar questions
  • Add more detailed instructions
  • Provide explicit response templates
  • Lower temperature setting
  • Include more examples
Scope CreepAgent attempts to answer questions outside its intended domain
  • Explicitly define boundaries
  • Include instructions for gracefully declining out-of-scope requests
  • Test with boundary-case examples
OvergenerationAgent provides unnecessarily long or detailed responses
  • Specify response length limits
  • Provide conciseness instructions
  • Create templates with clear structural limits
Incorrect ToneAgent’s communication style doesn’t match brand or purpose
  • Provide explicit tone guidelines
  • Include positive and negative examples
  • List specific phrases or terminology to use/avoid
Instruction OverloadToo many instructions causing inconsistent application
  • Prioritize and streamline instructions
  • Group related guidelines
  • Test with smaller instruction sets
  • Iterate based on observed behavior

​
Testing and Evaluation

Effective testing is crucial for simple prompting agents. Consider these approaches:

Scenario Testing

Create realistic user scenarios and evaluate agent responses

Edge Case Validation

Test boundary conditions and unusual requests

Comparative Evaluation

Compare different instruction versions to identify improvements

User Feedback Collection

Gather real user experiences to guide refinements

​
Advanced Techniques

Once you’ve mastered basic simple prompting, consider these advanced techniques:
Create multi-dimensional personas with primary and secondary characteristics that influence responses in different contexts.Example:
Primary persona: Financial advisor with 15+ years experience
Secondary traits:
- Patient teacher when explaining complex concepts
- Detail-oriented when discussing regulations
- Conservative when making recommendations
- Empathetic when discussing personal financial challenges
Define different response structures based on query types or user needs.Example:
If the user asks for a process explanation:
  1. Provide a high-level overview in 1-2 sentences
  2. List steps in numerical order
  3. Include relevant cautions or notes after each step
  4. Conclude with common problems and solutions

If the user asks for a product comparison:
  1. Create a table with key features side by side
  2. Highlight main differences in bullet points
  3. Provide a recommendation based on stated needs
  4. Include pricing information if available
Implement conditional logic to handle complex decision-making scenarios.Example:
When advising on cloud storage solutions:

1. First determine primary use case:
   - If primarily document storage → evaluate document management features
   - If primarily media storage → evaluate bandwidth and format support
   - If primarily backup → evaluate security and recovery features

2. Then assess scale requirements:
   - If <10 users → recommend small business tier
   - If 10-100 users → recommend business tier
   - If >100 users → recommend enterprise tier
   
3. Finally consider technical expertise:
   - If low technical expertise → emphasize ease-of-use and support
   - If medium technical expertise → balance features and usability
   - If high technical expertise → focus on advanced features and customization
Include instructions for how the agent should handle its own limitations or uncertainty.Example:
When you're uncertain about a technical detail:
1. Explicitly acknowledge the limitation: "I want to be careful about providing accurate information here."
2. Share what you do know with confidence
3. Indicate the specific area of uncertainty
4. Suggest how the user might find authoritative information

Example response:
"I want to be careful about providing accurate information here. The Acme Cloud Platform definitely supports automatic file versioning and retention policies. However, I'm not certain about the specific retention limits in the Enterprise tier. I recommend checking the official documentation at docs.acmecloud.com/retention or contacting your account representative for the most up-to-date information."
Structure information to present it in digestible layers, from basic to advanced.Example:
When explaining technical concepts:

1. Begin with a simple 1-2 sentence explanation accessible to beginners
2. Follow with practical implications/applications
3. Then provide more technical details for intermediate users
4. Finally, include advanced considerations or edge cases for expert users

Always separate these layers visually (with headings or breaks) to allow users to stop at their needed level of detail.
⌘I